South Carolina Supreme Court Upholds Ruling Against Governor’s School Voucher ProgramRequest

South Carolina Supreme Court Denies Governor’s Request on School Voucher Program

Columbia, S.C. – In a notable decision on Thursday, the South Carolina Supreme Court has officially denied a request from Governor Henry McMaster for a rehearing regarding the controversial Education Scholarship Trust Fund program. This ruling follows a previous decision made in September, where the court deemed a significant part of this program unconstitutional.

What’s at Stake?

The Education Scholarship Trust Fund was designed to assist families in South Carolina who fall below a certain income threshold by providing them with $6,000 each year. This funding was meant to help cover various school-related expenses. However, a crucial aspect of the program allowed families to use these funds for private school tuition, a feature that the court found troubling.

In a 3-2 ruling back in September, the court concluded that providing state funds directly to private or religious schools violates the state’s constitution. This ruling left many families feeling anxious about their options. Nonetheless, the court clarified that while vouchers for private school tuition were off the table, families could still use the funds for items like school supplies, tutoring, and other permissible expenses for students enrolled in public school districts.

Governor McMaster’s Reaction

Unsurprisingly, Governor McMaster expressed dissatisfaction with the court’s decision. He filed a request for the court to reconsider, arguing that the previous ruling was fundamentally flawed. McMaster insisted that the funding provided by the scholarship was intended as an indirect benefit to students and claimed that the legislature worked diligently to structure the program in a way that aligns with constitutional guidelines.

“The legislature worked very hard on determining a way to ensure this would be deemed an indirect benefit,” the governor stated. He emphasized that the program specifically targets lower-income families and is not unlimited in scope, saying, “So we think it’s a good law, and that’s why we’re asking for a rehearing.”

The Court’s Final Word

After Governor McMaster’s request was presented, the court stood firm in its original ruling. The spokesperson for the governor expressed disappointment, declaring the decision as a “heartbreaking and devastating blow” for the thousands of low-income families impacted by the policy change.

Reactions from Educators and Advocates

On the other side of the aisle, many educators and advocates have expressed gratitude towards the court for upholding its decision. Sherry East, the president of the South Carolina Education Association, noted, “We are grateful for the recent reaffirmation by our state’s Supreme Court, which has made it clear, not once, but twice, that voucher programs violate our state’s constitution.”

East asserted that the ruling sends a robust message that public funds should be devoted to public schools, which serve over 95% of South Carolina’s children.

A Community Divided

This latest development has undoubtedly sparked conversations across the state. Families who were looking forward to utilizing the scholarship for private education might feel disheartened, while supporters of public education view this ruling as a victory for the system designed to serve the majority of students.

As this story continues to unfold, it’s clear that the debate over education funding and school choice in South Carolina will remain a hot topic. For many, the focus now shifts back to the public school system and ensuring that all children have access to quality education.

In this dynamic landscape, communities are encouraged to stay engaged and informed about how these decisions will shape the education system in South Carolina.